UN pass motion condemning clash jumper decision | Titus O'Reily

You are here

UN pass motion condemning clash jumper decision

A resolution calling for the abolition of clash jumpers in the AFL was formally adopted today by the U.N. General Assembly.

The passage in a plenary vote followed the nonbinding motion’s approval by the assembly’s First Committee on AFL issues on Saturday.

A four-hour speech by Kevin Bartlett to the General Assembly is believed to have gotten potential no voters, Russia and China across the line, just to get him to stop speaking.

As a result, the resolution was backed by all 193 countries, the first time every member country has approved a resolution since the UN’s condemnation of Cameron Ling’s special comments back in August last year.

The resolution calls for the AFL to ‘allow Richmond to wear its traditional jumper in this year’s Grand Final and to ban forever the use of the marketing gimmick that are clash jumpers’.

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said the AFL’s ruling that Richmond must wear a clash jumper in the Grand Final was a clear ‘breach of human rights’.

“There’s not even a clash!” Mr Guterres angrily told the assembled world media, “It’s not like if you’re wearing a Tigers jumper, you could melt into a group of Crows supporters like you’re the alien in Predator.”

“The pointlessness of this decision was the only thing I’ve been able to get North and South Korea to agree on in my entire time here.”

“The AFL’s stance would obviously ruin any premiership victory, to the point I’m sure Tigers fans wish they hadn’t even made the Grand Final.”

AFL General Counsel Andrew Dillon said the AFL did not recognise the authority of the UN and reserved its right to make crazy decisions whenever the mood takes them.

You can help support me in producing this ridiculous nonsense I churn out on a regular basis. My aim is to keep as much of my stuff on this site and available to everyone and not behind paywalls. Find out more here: https://titusoreily.com/support-titus

Comments

JB 24 September 2017

Funny but wrong. Good decision AFL. Eat a dick Kevin Bartlett.

David W 24 September 2017

Hessian sacks, pjs, nude. It's been so long who cares what we wear. KB cannot discuss fashion whilst he still pretends to have hair. Bring on Saturday, the bananas in pyjamas are due a win.

iPib 24 September 2017

Yellow and Black. Not Black and Yellow.

Clingycat 24 September 2017

Will no one defend Lingy from these continuous scurrilous attacks?! The great red head deserves your undying love & respect.

TheDee 25 September 2017

Yet another scam from the marketers at AFL House to make us part with our hard-earned. There is so much bullshit about this sort of stuff then they run the umpires out in the same colours as one of the "clash" jumpers. If the two sets of jumpers REALLY clash then I'm a monkey's uncle. What's that you say Rhesus?

Brett Nicholls 25 September 2017

Maybe they should just go with skins and shirts

John 25 September 2017

It's rumoured the AFL is considering non-binding a postal vote on the issue.

KWof Perth 25 September 2017

Funny article, particularly the KB bit. But a clear clash exists. Not a marketing gimmick at all.
Yep, I've been to SpecSavers. All good.

Max 26 September 2017

There is a definite clash! I know - I asked my wife.

Max 26 September 2017

Correction. There may be a clash. I asked my partner in a non binding postal survey.

Leave a comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.